Sermon: Mary, Martha, and Male Space (Luke 10:38-42), Nov 13th, 2022

Sermon: Mary, Martha, and Male Space 

(The Extension of Love)

Text: Luke 10:38-42


In Korea, I was Mary. I was born Mary, grew up as Mary, and later, in my university years, in marriage and at church, I insisted upon claiming myself as Mary. Growing up, in my small world, I felt like I was surrounded by Marthas, indeed, many Marthas, … They were my friends, relatives, mothers and grandmothers, neighbours, church deaconesses, and so on.

 

My mother was a high school teacher when she met my father. She was an English teacher; an accomplished professional. After she had me, she stayed at home. She was quite happy about it. Staying at home after marriage or after the first child was born was common among the women in her generation. It was my mother’s great joy to give all of her time and energy to feed and care for her two children, me and my one-year-younger brother. My Mom didn’t mind being a full-time Martha for me. She was Martha, happily Martha, and yet she wanted her daughter to be 100 percent Mary. I, her child, played, studied, learned, explored the world with her full support. Mom wanted me to achieve the full 100 percent of my potential. In the meantime, my aunts, my big mother (my father’s older brother’s wife, so, the highest-ranking auntie), my paternal grandmother, considered me to be different from the other female children in the family. They didn’t know exactly how to treat me, because I wasn’t being raised in the same servant-Martha mold as most of the other girls. 


During Korean holidays, Lunar New Years Day and Thanksgiving Day, my paternal family gathered for two to three days at my Big Mother’s home. The typical scene you would see in an ordinary Korean home is that all adult women — aunts, mothers, grandmother, and daughters-in-law — are in the kitchen, with their respective roles: food prep, cooking, tasting, ordering, directing, cleaning, serving those in the living room – the men. All male adults and their sons are sitting, talking, laughing, enjoying the plentiful food and liquor on the tables, with no obligation or expectation to help or even enter the kitchen. Most Korean foods require lots of prepping, constant attention and busy hands. It’s like Christmas or Thanksgiving, without a turkey, but twice as many side dishes that have to be cooked and ready to serve.



In the living room, sometimes my boy cousins would be invited to sit at the table and join the adult conversation. I was the only female child, among my cousins, and what I did was, rather than waiting for an invitation which would not be given to me, I would “intrude” on the male space and sit beside my father for a bit. I was a child Mary in the male space, and I insisted on it. I needed to feel that I was not subordinate or expected to only belong in Martha’s place of servitude.

 

My story of being a child Mary, figuring out where to place myself between Martha’s place and the male space influences how I read and hear the story of Mary and Martha in the Gospel. I would ask what ‘better portion, better choice’ Mary would have actually looked for… What was she claiming? Sitting quietly at the feet of Jesus and listening, or actively figuring out her place in the world to know and hold herself as the child of God, God’s word and wisdom flaming like fire in her heart?

 

It would be interesting to imagine and figure out where Lazarus, the brother of Mary and Martha, might have been at the dinner. Among Marthas, my grandmother, who never showed any enthusiasm for being in the kitchen, was raised in a society which preferred and elevated males and sons. She had not known any alternative understanding about equality. She projected and practiced the only values she had been taught and learned herself — girls need to know that they are worth less than their brothers and male cousins, and women are worth less than fathers and husbands. One year, when the family gathered again for the Lunar New Year holiday, all my cousins and I were given a ‘blessing’ envelope with money, very traditional, and when I found out that I was only given half the amount my younger brother and male cousins got, I was furious. Unhappy and frustrated, I made a complaint. I was in grade 6. 


Every holiday, as many Korean families still do, we had the ritual of remembering and honouring our ancestors. It was painful to me to stand in the line of Marthas — my mother, aunts, female children — and watch my boy cousins and my younger brother come to the front to light the incense and pour the liquor for our ancestors, one after another.

 

One more story about being Mary. After the wedding, Min-Goo and I, newlyweds, started our first home in the makeshift house the church built for their assistant ministers’ family, on the roof of the four-story church building. Min-Goo, newly ordained, became the new assistant minister of the church … The birth of a new prince in the church, while I was recruited as a silent, smiling angel. I remember one lunch at church, so vividly. I was a new bride, and that day, I got a phone call from a lay deaconess who was hired full-time to cook and take care of the kitchen at church. With great delight, she asked me to come down to the kitchen and have lunch together. “Lunch is ready.” All the ministers were called too. I knew that joining the lunch was not an option to accept or turn down – it was mandatory. I went downstairs. In the warm, small room beside the kitchen a wonderful Korean lunch was set up for everyone. About the time when everyone had finished eating, someone lifted their jaw up, like this (show the gesture – its arrogance cuts across cultural barriers). An indication, more than a hint. Looking at me, then, looking at the kitchen sink, messaging me to get up. Start cleaning. What are you waiting for? Many Marthas prepared this table. Are you not one of them? Do your job.

 

Over the years, I met many Marthas, and they all had something to tell me. Comments, advice, criticism, questions, complaints… “What’s your plan after graduating from theological school? (Meaning, the wife of a minister is not supposed to become the minister.)” Mocking me, “You have been educated so much, but look at yourself. You are just a mother with a child, living in this shabby house.” To sum up, why are you trying to be so Mary, when you are, and should be, Martha.

 

I confess that, even after many years, I worked hard to not move from the place of Mary. I was afraid of my “better portion” being taken away, and being placed in Martha’s position, involuntarily, in the patriarchal hierarchy. Partly, “struggling to be the Sun again”, taking the path of ordination, being ordained, preaching, organizing new projects, looking for and initiating new possibilities with those who spark my desire for learning and teaching, has been the way I continue to claim myself as Mary in traditionally male or culturally White spaces. 


Then, over time, especially as I grow older, and the Marthas in my life get older too, “us” verses “them” reversed… Mary versus Martha and Martha versus Mary reverse…

 

I have become more willing to understand and care for the Marthas in my life. I now see their weakness and their strength, their fragility and their perseverance in making their lives work for themselves. I started to forgive them for trying to force me into their own mold; I started to accept them as who they were, as resilient people whose actions lived in the context of their generation and culture. On her passing away, in the last moment of her peaceful leaving, I got a phone call from an aunt to come quickly and visit my grandmother and greet her. My grandmother was not able to move any part of her body, her face unable to make any expression or words. And yet, in the last moment, my heart saw her quickly smiling, perhaps an illusion, but I saw her greeting and her smile that accepted my complicated feelings. Mutual forgiveness didn’t need words, and exchanging the words was impossible anyways, but the extension, the reaching out of love was present.

 

This past summer, my family made a long-overdue visit to Korea. All of my paternal-side family members gathered again for the anniversary of my grandmother’s death. My uncles, fathers, boy cousins, all sat in the living room and exchanged lots of conversation over the Korean delicacies my Marthas prepared in the kitchen. Meanwhile, the Marthas were happy to cook, sitting around their kitchen table and chatting pleasantly. There was a difference from my childhood. My older relatives, now in their seventies, did not hide that they were tired. Their energy, their hands and feet were not the same as when they were in their forties or fifties. I changed too. Over the years, I learned to value how serving others in love, feeding the hungry, caring for children and the elderly, sustains the family and community. On my grandmother’s anniversary, I took the job of Martha, making myself busier than my aunts and mother. I learned the “better portion, better choice” for Mary includes solidarity, holding our sister’s hands, learning to be resilient, loving and revolutionary. Intergenerationally. Interculturally.

 

So, this Sunday, I may not be standing here to present to you a sermon-smart, preaching-powerful “message”, or a lesson. I take this prestigious opportunity to share my story with you and how I approached this Gospel story, based on my lived experience. We bring ourselves, when we engage each story. I love this phrase from T.S. Eliot, “The purpose of literature is to turn blood into ink.” If blood means life, I find my life’s story, my lived experience, the journey of struggling to be the Sun again, in the ink of the Bible. If I had a magic wand, a Gospel wand, and could make the story end with an open-ended question, I would ask Martha and Jesus, (who represents the “male space” in the Bible) to sit with me, somewhere that is neutral, not the kitchen or the living room — creating a third, brave space — , and actively wonder what truly the “best portion, the best choice” for Mary can be; whether we can create a space of “trinity”, not “pyramid (hierarchy)”. The trinity acceptance of Mary, Martha and Jesus to co-create and co-facilitate the empowering love that seeks understanding, solidarity, and transformation of all three parties, like a “family” of God, who is not male, nor female… and which has no segregated corner of what Martha’s task is and what Mary’s better portion is.

 

Extend the love that flows through generations and across cultures; us versus them is outmoded thinking. Mary versus Martha, Martha and Mary versus Male Space… If we intend to seek one another in faith and understanding, all spaces, of service and learning and teaching, need to flow into each other – no separation, no barriers, a community of all, for all.

 

“We have not known You as You should be known.” (Rumi)

 

Extend your love…


Sermon: The Creation of We (The story of Mary and Martha, Luke 10:38-42), Nov 6th, 2022

Sermon: The Creation of We

Text: Mary and Martha (Luke 10:38-42)

It’s my first November in Victoria, and as a few people have told me/warned me… It means a lot of rain! I am also discovering it can mean a lot of wind as well, along with power outages. Even with the quick change of seasons this year, we will stay consistent by continuing to follow our theme… “Telling Our Story, Sharing Our Faith” with a new story: Mary and Martha. When the staff met for the first time and thought about the theme and stories, one of the hopes we shared was, Let’s present each story with an open-ended question… What if God gave us a magic pen, magic wand, and we can change how the story will end… the conclusion part of the story, the last chapter of the story… into an open-ended question? Among the many stories we had to choose from, Mary and Martha stood out. 

So, what do we mean by if you are given a magic wand, how can you change the Gospel story, making a new question, an open-ended one? This picture, A Nail Salon by Chris Buck featured in Oprah Magazine is a good example of creating an open-ended question. 



Intentionally, some things have been flipped. 




Because I am an Asian person, I tend to notice more when I see other Asian women. I see how they are treated, what they do, how many of them appear in a Movie or a Netflix show, and what their roles are, and whether “we” see them at the table for decision-making or forget to even invite them. And when I say “we”, it addresses another interesting question: who “we” are. When I say “we”, in my daily casual conversation, and when we say “we”, in a sermon or prayers during worship, who is assumed to be included, or excluded? For a very subtle example, if we prayed… “We pray for those who are hungry…” “We welcome newcomers….” Who are we? 

It is interesting and challenging work to be mindful and reflect on how we use “we”; those who are assumed as “we” and those who are not. 

Two Sundays ago, Michael E, the testimony giver that Sunday, with the Testimony with Question Mark (“Testimony?”), was going out after service and said to me… “You know, ‘queering’ is what artists often do in their art studio. To see if each part is in balance, they flip the canvas upside down. When you look at the same picture in the same angle all the time, you cannot really find it. When all parts are in good balance even when flipped, the job is done.” 

The key is that when something is not right, something is missing, if something makes you, us, me, uncomfortable or sad, God gives you a new question… A magic, new, Gospel wand to flip the canvas upside down… for imagination. 

When the need for creating a greater, inclusive “we” emerges… When there’s a message, even if it is not spoken, and even if nobody in the room is actually thinking it in the moment, in certain social settings, there are some of us hearing the message:

“You are not from here.” 

“You don’t matter as much as me.” 

“You are less than, not wanted, not as valuable.” 

It is a tremendous burden for those who hear it. 

Barriers adds to the burden. (Language, racism, disability or differing abilities, or gender) 

The magic wand as “rigorous wonder” (Michael E and the philosopher he mentioned), and the creation of “we” will assist us to rewrite the story of our city, church, Canada, Korea, World… Everyhwere.

In today’s story, Mary and Martha play their roles in their places, respectively. There are accepted norms. Martha is in the kitchen. Mary is sitting at the feet of Jesus, learning, and yet in the depiction of the Gospel writer Luke, Mary is so silent. Definitely, Mary is given unusual permission or acceptance at that time, “Crossing the gender-threshold into male space”, the learning, theological education, designated for male disciples. Mary, in the near future, would form the core of Jesus’ female disciples, and yet Luke, the Gospel writer of this story, gives no words to Mary. Mary is silent and passively listening to Jesus while Martha is fussing and distracted in her service. Jesus chides Martha, as if Martha is a little child, and these two sisters are not connected… Luke does not give space in the story for these two sisters, these two women, to talk to each other and figure out a solution together. 

In contrast, in the Gospel of John, Mary challenges Jesus and accompanies him to the tomb of his brother, Lazarus. Martha emerges and “comes out” in the crowd from her hometown and confesses Jesus as Messiah. In Gospel stories, the action of confession is significant, a risky act, therefore, it is proclamation… it’s a kind of coming out. And Martha is doing it. Mary and Martha, with agency in their hearts, alive, undiminished, work together to bring Jesus’ attention to their brother’s death, lead him to mourn with them, and then, Jesus re-writes the story of the life of Lazarus, as the result. The magic wand of a resurrection story, preceding Jesus’ own. 

So, how is the greater, more inclusive, WE, created, with every actor’s agency and joy?


Here, I would like to introduce a concept, called Ren/Yin. It’s from Confucianism, and this letter/character is used in a lot of words in Korean and I am quite sure, in a variety of East Asian languages. As you see, the letter is constructed with two parts. I hope you can find the figure on the left side that looks like a human being standing. Yes, that figure signifies a human being. Now, the two lines above and below signify the number two. It’s about how human community works. It needs more than two people, more than two hearts, more than two stacks, to be built upon. The principal definition of Ren means ‘benevolence’. It also means ‘consideration, compassion, humanity, charity.’ Human feelings of joy, anger, sorrow, happiness arise because every human being has ren as their human nature, as the deeper foundation of all feelings. If there is not the capacity to love as the deeper foundation in the first place, we would not be able to mourn, be disappointed, angry, or joyful. So, Ren is fundamentally about our innate nature and capacity to “feel” and respond, in compassion and benevolence. East Asian religions generally acknowledge and teach about our human capacity to feel and to respond to the other’s needs, other’s suffering, other’s joy, and the universe. It’s not just a religious concept; it’s a societal foundation. The key to building, establishing a community. To feel and respond is called Kameung. Because every being, every human being, everything in the universe, is connected in chi (energy). When we feel, we are moved by the other and move the other. To establish others first in order to establish ourselves is called the art of ren

Here, we live in a society that is built on colonization, and the most problematic structure of colonization is keeping the frame of valuing one over the other. One kind must be better and valued more, and the other must be less than and valued less. Martha in the story represents diakonia. Diakonia does not specify domestic service. Martha is not distracted with kitchen duties as traditionally preached, but with her responsibilities that included care for Jesus’ followers and community.

If I were given a magic Gospel wand to re-write the story, I would insert the art of ren into how these three actors engage, Jesus, Mary and Martha. Us versus them occurs (show the picture of A Nail Salon) when we consider the other, the other’s situation, the others’ feelings, as having no bearing on our lives. We have nothing to do with them. What they feel has nothing to do with our lives, our present, our group. Their problems are not ours; we have no responsibility. This is the frame of us versus them, and the structure that enables this disconnection is the frame of spiritual, racial, gender and cultural hierarchy. One is more valuable than the other. 

In today’s Gospel story, when Jesus says, “Martha, Martha, Mary has chosen the better part.” The better portion is not sitting passively and listening quietly. The better portion we are called to choose is reserving room in our heart for taking a deep breath, pausing, looking, really looking at the other, being able to feel the other’s feeling,

To do so, we need to flip the canvas, actively listen, and paint the next chapter of the story with our Gospel magic wand, "the multi-coloured wisdom of God. (Ephesians 3:10)"

We are able to overcome ‘us’ versus ‘them’ and create and recreate who “we” are … when we say, we! 

It is helpful to remember that, even though we are not the same, and even if we cannot talk about us, assuming we are the same, we feel the same. When we are seen, valued, respected, honoured, included, recognized, Martha, Jesus, Mary, all of us, feel the same. “I am with friends. I could hang out for long time.” “I belong.” “I feel equal.”

Martha, Jesus, Mary, all of us, are connected in ren, the capacity to love and grow connection, seeking faith in understanding. The biggest magic, good news, Gospel wand is that in this universe, the blessings of chi flows rigorously, “God as vast flowing energy” like a stream, living water, enabling us to connect, touch, feel and respond, constantly challenging and changing our perception of who “we” are when we say “we”, in the new creation of “We”… 

So, today, flip your canvas — ‘us’ versus ‘them’ — upside down, and take another look to see the beauty of we.

Featured Post

Sermon: The Images of God in the Reversed World (Matthew 22:15-22), Oct 23rd, 2022

Sermon: The Images of God in the Reversed World    (Scripture: Matthew 22:15-22) After the ConXion service, Oct 23rd, 2022, celebrating the ...

Popular Posts